Day 2 Videos 21-24

Table of Contents (clickable links)

Back to main page.

Shawn Buckley

Shawn Buckley, a regulatory lawyer from Alberta, reviewed the Pfizer safety and efficacy data. Every single one of us has been coerced and pressured to participate in a massive human experiment, he stated. Government and employers both required the shots. The public messaging was intense that created fear and hatred. The “unvaccinated” were to be put in camps, or denied essential services, if the wishes of some had been fulfilled. Meanwhile, long-term safety data is not available. Health Canada, in what reads like propaganda in a police state, declares the “vaccines” have been proven to be totally safe and effective. Pfizer has to meet a mandatory test produced by Health Canada, and if it meets that test, Health Canada must approve Pfizer’s product, and has no discretion. Buckley reads out the test: “The Minister has sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that the benefits associated with the drug outweigh the risks”. In other words, Pfizer does not have to prove that the “vaccine” is safe, or that it works, or even that the benefits outweigh the risks. All Pfizer has to do is cherry-pick data to support the conclusion—and that constitutes “sufficient evidence”. The second part of the test even allows for uncertainties about safety and efficacy: “…having regard to the uncertainties relating to the benefits and risks and the urgent public health need”. In other words, Buckley argues, Pfizer has not had to prove either safety or efficacy.

Preston Manning observes that the government came to a conclusion first—that “vaccines” were the solution to the Covid crisis—and then everything was bent around that. Buckley says it’s worse: it was about Health Canada just approving something.

Buckley says this is a fraud on the Canadian people. None of the coercive measures can be justified. Doctors are forced to follow the party line. The police have not investigated this. The courts have not done their duty. The media have been totally captured. How many kids have to be killed or disabled before our society wakes up?

Louis Browne

Louis Browne, in Regina, Saskatchewan, a lawyer, speaks on informed consent and bodily autonomy. In particular, he detailed the process of submitting freedom of information requests on the questions pertinent to these hearings, which he has done.

Tania (mother) and Nicole Minnikin

Tania Tavernier, from Alberta, had her her 19-year-old daughter, Deana, pass away after being “vaccinated” seven months ago. The official cause of death has not been released. “Deanna was a healthy 19-year-old living in Alberta with no history of head injuries, seizures or any chronic illnesses. In less than 24 hours after receiving her 1st Covid “vaccine” she was in the emergency department having suffered her 1st seizure. Emergency physician noted on her chart “Interestingly, had Pfizer vaccine dose yesterday…event reported to AEFI.”

“Despite this significant adverse reaction, none of the medical professionals treating Deanna warned her that she could be at risk if she took the 2nd Covid vaccine, and in fact, she was encouraged to do so. Once again, within 24 hours of the 2nd shot she experienced her 2nd seizure. One month later she had her 3rd seizure and told not to drive or swim for six months and placed indefinitely on anti-seizure medication. Her 4th seizure two weeks later would be her last. Deanna died on November 23, 2021. The $100 gift Visa card given to her by the Alberta government as a reward for getting vaccinated received after death and remains uncashed.”

Her sister, Nicole Minnikin, 25, spoke next about her experience with the “vaccine”. She was five-months pregnant with her second child. Because she suffered from hyperemesis throughout her pregnancy, she was told by her physician that getting covid presented more of a risk than getting vaccinated. She was strongly encouraged to get her first shot, despite sharing that her sister had experienced a severe adverse reaction to her first shot. Nicole trusted her doctor and got the Pfizer vaccine. She began showing symptoms of potential miscarriage within 24 hours and 11 days later, her son, Connor, was stillborn. Understandably distraught, Nicole confronted her doctor and questioned her recommendation to get vaccinated. The heated discussion resulted in Nicole being given an ultimatum to take the second covid shot or find another doctor. Due to the shortage of doctors in Ontario and the duress of potentially not finding another doctor in Ontario, she took a second shot. Nicole became pregnant again 3 months after losing Connor and suffered another miscarriage.

[It is important for the reader to know that there were severe interruptions to the stream from the family, and some key details were either lost or garbled. Others who listened believed they heard that Nicole also lost her second baby after her second shot.]

Ryan Gassner

Ryan Gassner from Alberta, represented his 19-year-old daughter. She was diagnosed with a learning disability. She also had a history of autoimmune disorder. She was sent to a local college to prepare her for the workplace. She got “vaccinated” with Pfizer at a pharmacy, without consent as she was confused that she was instead getting a test. She had multiple seizures thereafter. She came back to live at home. After another seizure, she hit her head in the shower, and was rushed to the ER. She has now had probably more than a hundred seizures of various sorts. Doctors says she has a condition of progressive myoclonic epilepsy. She had not had seizures since she was a small child—these last ones began only after her one and only shot. She is only able to handle being out of the house for an hour a day; she sleeps about 18-19 hours a day; her cognitive function has been cut in half. Medical professionals refuse to recognize it as a “vaccine” injury, preferring to chase other leads instead.

In response to questions, Ryan said they contacted the RCMP to press charges of the “vaccination” being given without consent, to no avail. He seems to have been dissuaded from pursuing legal options. His family has no financial assistance for obtaining specialized care for his daughter.